The Tamesis
Editor’s note: This story originally appeared in On Balance, art news Newsletter about the art market and beyond. Register here Receive it every Wednesday.
Every young artist wants gallery representation. Details vary. Maybe Gagosian. Maybe Hauser & Wirth. Maybe it’s a cluttered gallery on Henley Street with a leaky roof and the owner who still installs every show himself. The dream remains very consistent: someone believes in your work enough to put their signature behind it. Ask an artist what success looks like and sooner or later galleries will join the conversation.
Related articles
Oddly, despite the artist spending years chasing gallery representation, the implications of this arrangement remain surprisingly difficult to define. Ask a lawyer and they will talk about contracts. Ask a dealer and they’ll talk about partnerships. Ask an artist and you’ll often hear something closer to hope.
being a british artist Nigel Cook When he solidified his relationship with his first gallery in 2002, he didn’t envision auction records or private jets. He just wanted to stop teaching and avoid working in a warehouse. Making enough money from painting to support myself seemed ambitious. The gallery was Stuart Shave/Modern Art, then a young gallery operating out of a converted shopfront in London’s Shoreditch neighborhood. More established galleries were not interested. Cook told me that joining Stuart Sheff was a leap of faith.
The gamble paid off. The museum acquired his work. The curator called. Sales happen. The gallery’s and Cook’s reputation grew accordingly. Twenty-four years later, Cooke (now represented by Pace) has just opened a dream show, “Bad Habits,” at the Quirinist Tempalia Foundation in Venice. Lasts until November 22nd. Cook made it clear to Pace that he wanted to be part of the Biennale in some way, and after establishing some relationships, the foundation invited him to become its first artist-in-residence and provided him with a studio in the historic palace, where he created a series of new paintings inspired by the city and its lagoon.
By most standards, the system works. Yet one of the most sobering things Cook told me in a recent interview is that galleries rarely have the kind of long-term roadmap an artist imagines.
“When you’re young, you think you’re joining some holy team,” he said of finally getting representation. Suppose someone is looking after you right now. But he said the reality is more complicated. No one really knows an artist’s entire career. The gallery may strategize about the next exhibition or beyond, but beyond that, Cook said, “it’s a blank slate.”
This observation comes up again and again when I talk to artists, dealers, and other art world operators about what it means to be gallery-represented.
The romantic version of gallery representation is a familiar, if unlikely, linear progression: a dealer discovers an artist, believes in his work, introduces it to collectors, puts it in a museum, and thus builds a career. The commercial version is less glamorous. It involves consignments, commissions, payment schedules, inventory, storage, exclusivity agreements and exit clauses. After all, gallery representation is, at its core, an economic relationship.
Savannah HuitemaLawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, a law firm that advises artists and galleries, told me that people on both sides of the relationship ignore this reality at their peril. “This is still a commercial system,” she said. “It would be a mistake to pretend it doesn’t exist.”
Artists tend to focus on what representation can do for them, but less on what will happen if the relationship ends. Huitema said some contracts contain termination clauses with long “tails,” allowing galleries to continue earning commissions long after the artist leaves. Other agreements allow galleries to continue selling inventory they already hold. When they get engaged, no one gives much thought to the possibility of divorce.
Interestingly, dealers often describe representation in almost opposite ways. When I asked the dealer Christine Tierney She didn’t start by talking about contracts about what representation means. She starts with the people. An artist in his 80s needs different things than an artist in his 30s. Sculptors require different support than video artists. One artist may want constant communication, while another prefers solitude.
“It’s a partnership,” she told me.
This phrase comes up again and again. Charlie MoffittIts galleries have gained attention not only for top-notch programming but also for offering health care benefits to artists, describing representation as a long-term commitment rather than a sales arrangement. He spent years getting to know artists before officially adding them to his roster. The goal is not just to sell the work, but to determine if the relationship is actually working.
His point is refreshingly simple: galleries should help artists sell their work. Artists should know when a work sells, who buys it, and when they get paid. That sounds obvious, but apparently it’s not, says Moffitt, who told me he’s heard stories of artists at openings who discovered that collectors had owned their works before the artists themselves knew the sale had taken place. In some cases, these artists are still waiting for payment. You don’t need a law degree to understand why these relationships don’t last.
For artists, however, the value of representation often only becomes clear after they have achieved it. painter sky grubush He spent several years exhibiting in smaller galleries before getting what he calls a career-changing opportunity. no longer exists Stephen Friedman Gallery. Suddenly there were dedicated sales teams, communications staff, artist liaisons, presentations at art fairs and presentations to collectors around the world.
The traditional split of sales between gallery and artist is 50-50. Some artists bristled at this division, but not Grubush. In his mind, half of something was much better than nothing at all. Before joining a larger gallery, he said, he could have spent just as much time and energy staging an exhibition and attracting a relatively small audience. With a larger movement behind him, the same effort suddenly reached an extensive network of collectors, curators, institutions and critics around the world. As Glabush says, “100 percent zero is zero.” The question isn’t how much money the gallery needs. The question is whether galleries are creating value that otherwise doesn’t exist.
“The energy you put into any exhibition is pretty much the same,” Grubush told me. “But when you have an exhibition in a place like this [Stephen Friedman]as long as you have this huge team behind you, your efforts will be amplified. “
The experience also allowed him to see how large galleries operate. Most dealers tend to focus on sales. Artists often follow exhibitions. When Grubush learned of Friedman’s imminent collapse, he decided to look for a more subtle approach. He effectively auditioned several interested galleries before settling on London-based Alison Jacques, who now represents him. His career thus far has made him realize the importance of things that many young artists don’t give a second thought to: curatorial vision, layout, documentation, and context. Jacques’ curatorial-focused project fit perfectly with what Grubbsch was looking for in a gallery.
A good dealer can protect an artist from a market that can sometimes be self-destructive, he said. They prevent prices from rising too quickly. They give the work to collectors who are likely to keep it rather than resell it. They ensure that the work is photographed correctly, as the images may become a permanent record long after the painting leaves the studio. Most importantly, they provide context. The best galleries don’t just sell the art, they help explain why it’s important to collectors and museums.
This may also explain why many artists have turned to the growing world of consultants and agents in recent years. company likes Hyphen by Andrea Glimcher, Chapter 291 Agencyfounded by Gagosian veteran Max Teicher, artist estateFounded by former Hauser & Wirth partner Christopher Canizares in response to an art world that was becoming larger, more international and more complex. Their contention is not that galleries have failed, but that artists need help navigating a rapidly growing system that now spans fairs, institutions, collectors, publications and multiple continents.
After talking to artists, dealers, lawyers, and consultants, I’m struck by how few describe agency as a destination. Cook offers a helpful analogy: The gallery world, he says, is like a school system. Different institutions make sense at different stages of a career. A young artist might thrive in a small gallery. A mid-career artist supporting a family may need the resources of a large family. Later in life, they may find themselves drawn back to a smaller gallery, where the owner still visits the studio and knows every collector by name.
The mistake is to think that gaining representation means uncertainty disappears. Uncertainty is a common phenomenon in artistic professions. A gallery representative can open doors. It can put work into museums. It can introduce artists to curators, collectors, critics and institutions. It can be career-changing. What it can’t do is guarantee one. This is the part artists usually discover after getting what they want.
